Checkfu

Standard set

Disciplinary Literacy Standards for Fine Arts: Grades 11, 12

Disciplinary Literacy Standards (2016-)Grades 11, 12CSP ID: 2E9F2A0F3440479492D152F02F081AF1_D2784930_grades-11-12Standards: 40

Standards

Showing 40 of 40 standards.

Filter by depth

Strand

Strand

Depth 0

Reading Standards for Literacy in Technical Subjects

Strand

Strand

Depth 0

Writing Standards for Literacy in Technical Subjects

Cluster

Cluster

Depth 1

Key Ideas and Details

Cluster

Cluster

Depth 1

Craft and Structure

Cluster

Cluster

Depth 1

Integration of Knowledge and Ideas

Cluster

Cluster

Depth 1

Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity

Cluster

Cluster

Depth 1

Text Types and Purposes

Cluster

Cluster

Depth 1

Production and Distribution of Writing

Cluster

Cluster

Depth 1

Research to Build and Present Knowledge

Cluster

Cluster

Depth 1

Range of Writing

RST.11-12.1

Standard

Depth 2

Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to important distinctions the author makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies in the account.

RST.11-12.2

Standard

Depth 2

Determine the central ideas or conclusions of a text; summarize complex concepts, processes, or information presented in a text by paraphrasing them in simpler but still accurate terms.

RST.11-12.3

Standard

Depth 2

Follow precisely a complex multi-step procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks; analyze the specific results based on explanations in the text.

RST.11-12.4

Standard

Depth 2

Determine the meaning of symbols, key terms, and other domain-specific words and phrases as they are used in a specific scientific or technical context relevant to grades 11-12 texts and topics.

RST.11-12.5

Standard

Depth 2

Analyze how the text structures information or ideas into categories or hierarchies, demonstrating understanding of the information or ideas.

RST.11-12.6

Standard

Depth 2

Analyze the author's purpose in providing an explanation, describing a procedure, or discussing an experiment in a text, identifying important issues that remain unresolved.

RST.11-12.7

Standard

Depth 2

Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., quantitative data, video, multimedia) in order to address a question or solve a problem.

RST.11-12.8

Standard

Depth 2

Evaluate the hypotheses, data, analysis, and conclusions in a science or technical text, verifying the data when possible and corroborating or challenging conclusions with other sources of information.

RST.11-12.9

Standard

Depth 2

Synthesize information from a range of sources (e.g., texts, experiments, simulations) into a coherent understanding of a process, phenomenon, or concept, resolving conflicting information when possible.

RST.11-12.10

Standard

Depth 2

By the end of grade 12, read and comprehend science/technical texts in the grades 11–CCR text complexity band independently and proficiently.

WHST.11-12.1

Standard

Depth 2

Write arguments focused on discipline-specific content

WHST.11-12.2

Standard

Depth 2

Write informative/explanatory texts, including the narration of historical events, scientific procedures/experiments, or technical processes.

WHST.11-12.4

Standard

Depth 2

Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.

WHST.11-12.5

Standard

Depth 2

Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach, focusing on addressing what is most significant for a specific purpose and audience.

WHST.11-12.6

Standard

Depth 2

Use technology, including the Internet, to produce, publish, and update individual or shared writing products in response to ongoing feedback, including new arguments or information.

WHST.11-12.7

Standard

Depth 2

Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.

WHST.11-12.8

Standard

Depth 2

Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the specific task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.

WHST.11-12.9

Standard

Depth 2

Draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.

WHST.11-12.10

Standard

Depth 2

Write routinely over extended time frames (time for reflection and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of discipline-specific tasks, purposes, and audiences.

WHST.11-12.1.a

Component

Depth 3

Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences the claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.

WHST.11-12.1.b

Component

Depth 3

Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form that anticipates the audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.

WHST.11-12.1.c

Component

Depth 3

Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claim(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim(s) and counterclaims.

WHST.11-12.1.d

Component

Depth 3

Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing.

WHST.11-12.1.e

Component

Depth 3

Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from or supports the argument presented.

WHST.11-12.2.a

Component

Depth 3

Introduce a topic and organize complex ideas, concepts, and information so that each new element builds on that which precedes it to create a unified whole; include formatting (e.g., headings), graphics (e.g., figures, tables), and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.

WHST.11-12.2.b

Component

Depth 3

Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the most significant and relevant facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience's knowledge of the topic.

WHST.11-12.2.c

Component

Depth 3

Use varied transitions and sentence structures to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships among complex ideas and concepts.

WHST.11-12.2.d

Component

Depth 3

Use precise language, domain-specific vocabulary and techniques such as metaphor, simile, and analogy to manage the complexity of the topic; convey a knowledgeable stance in a style that responds to the discipline and context as well as to the expertise of likely readers.

WHST.11-12.2.e

Component

Depth 3

Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the information or explanation provided (e.g., articulating implications or the significance of the topic).

WHST.11-12.2.f

Component

Depth 3

No 2f at this grade level

Framework metadata

Source document
Arkansas Disciplinary Literacy Standards for Fine Arts (2016)
License
CC BY 3.0 US
Normalized subject
The Arts
Disciplinary Literacy Standards for Fine Arts: Grades 11, 12 · Arkansas standards · Checkfu