Checkfu

Standard set

Grades 9-12

English Language Development Standards (2020-)Grades 09, 10, 11, 12CSP ID: D2BC033A2B6B4160A4BDBB96622D9AFBStandards: 119

Standards

Showing 119 of 119 standards.

Filter by depth

Depth 0

Social and Instructional Language

Depth 0

Language for Language Arts

Depth 0

Language for Mathematics

Depth 0

Language for Science

Depth 0

Language for Social Studies

ELD-SI.4-12.Narrate

Depth 1

Narrate

ELD-SI.4-12.Inform

Depth 1

Inform

ELD-SI.4-12.Explain

Depth 1

Explain

ELD-SI.4-12.Argue

Depth 1

Argue

Depth 1

Narrate

Depth 1

Inform

Depth 1

Argue

Depth 1

Explain

Depth 1

Argue

Depth 1

Explain

Depth 1

Argue

Depth 1

Explain

Depth 1

Argue

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Interpretive

Depth 2

Interpret language arts narratives by

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Expressive

Depth 2

Construct language arts narratives that 

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Interpretive

Depth 2

Interpret informational texts in language arts by 

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Expressive

Depth 2

Construct informational texts in language arts that

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 2

Interpret language arts arguments by

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 2

Construct language arts arguments that

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 2

Multilingual learners use language to interpret mathematical explanations by

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 2

Multilingual learners use language to construct mathematical explanations that

ELD-MA .9-12 .Argue .Interpretive

Depth 2

Interpret mathematics arguments by

ELD-MA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 2

Construct mathematics arguments that

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 2

Interpret scientific explanations by  

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 2

Construct scientific explanations that

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 2

Interpret scientific arguments by

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 2

Construct scientific arguments that 

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 2

Interpret social studies explanations by

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 2

Construct social studies explanations that

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 2

Interpret social studies arguments by

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 2

Construct social studies arguments that

ELD-SI.4-12.Narrate

Depth 3

Share ideas about one’s own and others’ lived experiences and previous learning

ELD-SI.4-12.Narrate

Depth 3

Connect stories with images and representations to add meaning

ELD-SI.4-12.Narrate

Depth 3

Identify and raise questions about what might be unexplained, missing, or left unsaid

ELD-SI.4-12.Narrate

Depth 3

Recount and restate ideas to sustain and move dialogue forward 

ELD-SI.4-12.Narrate

Depth 3

Create closure, recap, and offer next steps

ELD-SI.4-12.Inform

Depth 3

Define and classify facts and interpretations; determine what is known vs. unknown

ELD-SI.4-12.Inform

Depth 3

Report on explicit and inferred characteristics, patterns, or behavior

ELD-SI.4-12.Inform

Depth 3

Describe the parts and wholes of a system

ELD-SI.4-12.Inform

Depth 3

Sort, clarify, and summarize relationships

ELD-SI.4-12.Inform

Depth 3

Summarize most important aspects of information

ELD-SI.4-12.Explain

Depth 3

Generate and convey initial thinking

ELD-SI.4-12.Explain

Depth 3

Follow and describe cycles and sequences of steps or procedures and their causes and effects

ELD-SI.4-12.Explain

Depth 3

Compare changing variables, factors, and circumstances

ELD-SI.4-12.Explain

Depth 3

Offer alternatives to extend or deepen awareness of factors that contribute to particular outcomes

ELD-SI.4-12.Explain

Depth 3

Act on feedback to revise understandings of how or why something is or works in particular ways

ELD-SI.4-12.Argue

Depth 3

Generate questions about different perspectives

ELD-SI.4-12.Argue

Depth 3

Support or challenge an opinion, premise, or interpretation

ELD-SI.4-12.Argue

Depth 3

Clarify and elaborate ideas based on feedback 

ELD-SI.4-12.Argue

Depth 3

Evaluate changes in thinking, identifying trade-offs

ELD-SI.4-12.Argue

Depth 3

Refine claims and reasoning based on new information or evidence

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Interpretive

Depth 3

Identifying themes or central ideas that develop over the course of a text

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Interpretive

Depth 3

Analyzing how author choices about character attributes and actions relate to story elements (setting, event sequences, and context)

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating the impact of specific word choices on meaning, tone, and explicit vs. implicit points of view

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Expressive

Depth 3

Orient audience to context and one or multiple point(s) of view

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Expressive

Depth 3

Develop and describe characters and their relationships over a progression of experiences or events 

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Expressive

Depth 3

Develop story, advancing the plot and themes with complications and resolutions, time and event sequences

ELD-LA.9-12.Narrate.Expressive

Depth 3

Engage and adjust for audience 

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Interpretive

Depth 3

Identifying and/or summarizing central ideas

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Interpretive

Depth 3

Analyzing descriptions and inferences in textual evidence for key attributes, qualities, characteristics, activities, and conceptual relationships

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating cumulative impact and refinement of author’s key word choices over the course of text

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Expressive

Depth 3

Introduce and define topic and/or entity for audience

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Expressive

Depth 3

Establish an objective or neutral stance

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Expressive

Depth 3

Add precision, details, and clarity about complex attributes, qualities, characteristics, activities, and conceptual relationships

ELD-LA.9-12.Inform.Expressive

Depth 3

Develop coherence and cohesion throughout text

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Identifying and summarizing central ideas of primary or secondary sources

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Analyzing use of rhetoric and details to advance point of view or purpose

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating and corroborating relevance and sufficiency of evidence as well as validity of reasoning to support claims  

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Introduce and develop precise claims and address counterclaims

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Support claims and refute counterclaims with valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence 

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone  

ELD-LA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Logically organize claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence; offer a conclusion with recommendations

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Identifying concept or entity

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Analyzing data and owning problem-solving approaches

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating rationales, models, and/or interpretations based on evidence and mathematical principles

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Introduce mathematical concept or entity

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Share solutions with others

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Describe data and/or approach used to solve a problem

ELD-MA.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

State reasoning used to generate own or alternate solutions

ELD-MA .9-12 .Argue .Interpretive

Depth 3

Comparing conjectures with previously established results and stated assumptions

ELD-MA .9-12 .Argue .Interpretive

Depth 3

Distinguishing correct from flawed logic

ELD-MA .9-12 .Argue .Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating relationships among evidence and mathematical principles to create generalizations

ELD-MA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Create precise conjecture, using definitions, previously established results, and stated assumptions 

ELD-MA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Generalize logical relationships across cases

ELD-MA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Justify (and refute) conclusions with evidence and mathematical principles

ELD-MA.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Evaluate and extend others’ arguments

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Defining investigable questions or problems based on observations, information, and/or data about a phenomenon

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Paraphrasing central ideas in complex evidence, concepts, processes, and information to help explain how or why a phenomenon occurs

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating the extent to which reasoning, theory and/or models link evidence to claims and support conclusions

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Describe reliable and valid evidence from multiple sources about a phenomenon

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Establish neutral or objective stance in how results are communicated

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Develop reasoning to illustrate and/ or predict the relationships between variables in a system or between components of a system

ELD-SC.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Summarize and refine solutions referencing scientific knowledge, evidence, criteria, and/or trade-offs

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Identifying appropriate and sufficient evidence from data, models, and/or information from investigations of a phenomenon or design solutions

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Comparing reasoning and claims based on evidence from competing arguments or design solutions

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating currently accepted explanations, new evidence, limitations (trade-offs), constraints, and ethical issues

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Introduce and contextualize topic/ phenomenon in current scientific or historical episodes in science

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Defend or refute a claim based on data and evidence

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Establish and maintain an appropriate tone and stance (neutral/objective or biased/subjective)

ELD-SC.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Signal logical relationships among reasoning, evidence, data, and/or models when making and defending a claim, counterclaim, and/or rebuttal

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Determining multiple types of sources, points of view in sources, and potential uses of sources for answering compelling and supporting questions about phenomena or events

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Analyzing sources for logical relationships among contributing factors, causes, or related concepts

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating experts’ points of agreement and disagreement based on their consistency with explanation given its purpose

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Introduce and contextualize multiple phenomena or events 

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Establish perspective for communicating intended and unintended outcomes, consequences, or documentation

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Develop sound reasoning, sequences with linear and nonlinear relationships, evidence, and details with significant and pertinent information, acknowledging strengths and weaknesses

ELD-SS.9-12.Explain.Expressive

Depth 3

Generalize experts’ points of agreement and disagreement about multiple, complex causes and effects of developments or events

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Identifying topic and purpose (argue in favor or against a position, present a balanced interpretation, challenge perspective)

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Analyzing relevant information to support and/or revise claims with reliable and valid evidence from multiple sources

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Interpretive

Depth 3

Evaluating credibility, accuracy, and relevancy of source based on expert perspectives

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Introduce and contextualize topic

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Select relevant information to support precise and knowledgeable claims with evidence from multiple sources

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Establish perspective

ELD-SS.9-12.Argue.Expressive

Depth 3

Show relationships between claims and counterclaims, differences in perspectives, evidence, and reasoning

Framework metadata

Source document
WIDA English Language Development Standards Framework, 2020 Edition Kindergarten—Grade 12
License
CC BY 4.0 US