identify some common fallacies in reasoning (e.g., fallacies related to relevance, such as an appeal to pity or emotion and an appeal to authority; fallacies related to ambiguity, such as equivocation and fallacies of composition and division; fallacies related to presumption, such as begging the question and using a straw man), and identify examples of some of these fallacies in arguments encountered in everyday life (e.g., in newspaper articles and editorials, advertising, formal debates, informal discussions)
Standard detail
C1.4
Specific Expectation
Depth 2Parent ID: B862601F2FA54D46B2D10DFA200ED69AStandard set: Grade 11 - Social Sciences and Humanities (2013)
Original statement
Quick facts
- Statement code
- C1.4
- List ID
- C1.4
- Standard ID
- 4F7E68992D05461EA1DDE87F7EE341B9
- ASN identifier
- S2691571
- Subject
- [Archived] Ontario Standards
- Grades
- 11
- Ancestor IDs
- B862601F2FA54D46B2D10DFA200ED69AC1F840352DB1430AA7BB737BBBF3E02C
- Source document
- The Ontario Curriculum, Grades 9 to 12: Social Sciences and Humanities (2013)
- License
- CC BY 3.0 US